2021
Exports
$428World Rnk 0 / 0
Flag Rnk 0 / 0
falsefalseN/A
2022
PRODUCT COMPLEXITY IN Book-binding Machines
0.87Rnk 220 / 1025
2021
Imports
$355kWorld Rnk 0 / 0
Flag Rnk 0 / 0

About

Imports In 2018, North Korea imported $355k in Book-binding Machines, becoming the 0th largest importer of Book-binding Machines in the world. At the same year, Book-binding Machines was the 0th most imported product in North Korea. North Korea imports Book-binding Machines primarily from: N/A.

Latest Trends

Jul 2024

Subnational Monthly Trade

View
Flow
Y-AXIS SCALE

For a full breakdown of trade patterns, visit the trend explorer or the product in country profile.

The following visualization shows the latest trends on Book-binding Machines. Countries are shown based on data availability.

* Using January 2020 exchange rates when trade data is reported in local currency.

Explore Latest Trends

Subscribe today to OEC pro and access the latest data

Sign Up

Historical Data

Trade Balance

Color
EXPORTS (2021)$428
IMPORTS (2018)$355k
NET TRADE (2021)$428

Explore Visualizations

Export Destinations (2021)

Import Origins (2021)

Market Growth

Flow
THE FASTEST DECLINING MARKETS FOR THE EXPORT OF Book-binding Machines BY North Korea WERE (N/A - 2021):French Polynesia-$428 (-100%)

Change in Exports by Market (2018 - 2021)

Market Concentration

View
Flow
Type
In 2022, North Korea's main exporting competitors in Book-binding Machines were:
In 2022, North Korea's main importing competitors in Book-binding Machines were:

Explore Visualizations

Trade Value of Book-binding Machines by Exporters

Potential Exports

Potential Exports

Flow
View
N/A
N/AN/A
N/AN/A

Book-binding Machines’s highest export potential is N/A. With an export gap of N/A.   Book-binding Machines’s highest import potential is N/A with an import gap of N/A.

See methodology.

Subscribe today to OEC pro and access the latest data

Sign Up

Have questions, comments, or concerns?
Send us an e-mail: support@oec.world
Follow @OECtoday on
Created, Designed, and Developed by:
In collaboration with